A Theory of Corporate Incompetence

Even the most brilliant, historically proven governing strategies can come to grief. The Russian czars relied on a track record of dimness, bureaucratic idiocy and stubbornness to create mass fatalism. But that cocoon was breached by the disasters of the Great War. Russians who had put up with their rulers’ incompetence for decades had finally had enough.
G.W. Bush
Now we see our own triumphant incompetent, George W. Bush, continuing to reel from Hurricane Katrina. Sometimes even the most cynical public actually expects performance from its highest leaders. It may be premature to expect actual heads to roll, but it does seem like public tolerance for things like cronyism and inexcusable warmaking is, for the moment, greatly diminished.

For more on the strategic use of incompetence in the business, political and spiritual realms, see my article Compound Ineptitude, a theory of corporate incompetence. (Staying stupid means never having to say no.)

2 comments

  1. Machines supply another frontier for lucrative incompetence. Who profits from vending machines that somehow cannot be prevented from eating change?

  2. Bill,
    I think you’ve nailed it – almost. Ineptitude by itself is powerless. However, the perception of ineptitude is quite potent. Consider the object of your disdain. Even while the the country’s intellectuals are lampooning his slurred speech and simple ways, he’s getting his war, his permanent tax breaks and his ultra-conservative Supreme Court. George W. is the student of Reagan. the architect of the defeat of Communism. Reagan was in turn the student of Eisenhower, the architect of the defeat of Fascism. None of them were/are stupid; just underestimated. So keep laughing and W. will keep winning.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *