Interesting Ideas

Archive for January, 2012

Review: The Flirt

Posted in Art on January 31st, 2012

The Flirt
The Flirt by Booth Tarkington
My rating: 4 of 5 stars

The Flirt, like so many Tarkington stories, is first of all an exercise in gentleness. Tarkington loved his characters to a fault. To his heroes and heroines he showed gentle affection, to his comic relief gentle condescension, and to his villains gentle contempt. All that gentleness throws up a fog of good feeling, but behind the fog there are crags and cliffs of unhappiness, struggle and decay. In the fog is nostalgic escapism to what seems like a “simpler” time and place. But life turns out to be the same depressing, uphill scramble it always is, especially amid the dislocations of the early 20th Century – Tarkington’s most persistent and greatest theme.

View all my reviews

Book Review: Friedrich Schröder-Sonnenstern

Posted in Art, Book Review, Outsider Art on January 28th, 2012

Friedrich Schröder-Sonnenstern, essay by Pamela Kort. Michael Werner Gallery, 2011. ISBN: 978-1-8850-1381-1. Paperback $55

Friedrich Schroder-Sonnenstern book reviewFriedrich Schroder-Sonnenstern images of unexcelled symbolic intensity marked him as one of the most creative German artists of the mid-20th Century, but also an artist whose weirdly eroticized work was unlikely to be found on gallery walls in his own time. He was also hugely eccentric, putting in time as both a charlatan occultist and a mental patient, according to Pamela Kort’s essay in the recently published catalog for the exhibit From Barefoot Prophet to Avant-Garde Artist at Michael Werner Gallery in New York.

His serious production of art began with no training and minimal preparation, resulting in an effusion of highly idiosyncratic pictures. Combined with his mental health history it could sound like a typical art brut biography, but the story does not necessarily conform to the usual script. Kort argues that his time in mental institutions should not be taken at face value. He was troubled, certainly, and eccentric, but not necessarily insane.

Indeed, Schroder-Sonnenstern was hardly an isolate who labored in obscurity. Early in his artistic career he participated in a local art discussion group. More importantly, his work was recognized and promoted by such luminaries such as Marcel Duchamp, Andre Breton and Hans Bellmer and exhibited in surrealistic shows. But Schroder-Sonnenstern’s art did not fit into the aesthetic conversation that dominated the post-war German art world, and he remained virtually unknown in his own country, according to Kort.

Kort devotes much attention to the artist’s medical history, but mostly to make thae case (a bit ironically) that his mental health should not be over-emphasized. Her view is that a focus on his purported schizophrenia only serves to marginalize his work, in his own time and ours, and that in any case may have reflected the man’s disrepute more than a real diagnosis.

If she spends a bit too much time assessing his mental state, in the process she provides plenty of interesting biographical details about a man whose life was in fact very interesting, art aside. In the years after World War I he was active as a mystic, clairvoyant and quack healer, although Kort does not think he had much belief in those callings. But this is a case where even the most fascinating biography pales in the context of the art itself.

His typically pulchritudinous figures appear in a variety more or less threatening scenes, with violence suggested or explicit but almost always understated. The titles are as cryptic as the symbols in the work – “The Moralistic Moon Dualism,” “Zynus Theory – whether Demon of Desiccation and Withering” and “The People’s Joyful Miraculous Shirt, or the Moralistic Scarecrow.”

Kort takes her best shot at interpreting the mind-bending symbolism, but it’s not easy. The complexity of her explanations, however admirable the effort, simply can’t keep pace with the art she is attempting to interpret.

The one thing that can be said clearly about this enigmatic artist is that his status as a true outsider is unshakable. Not because of anything about this personality or work but for the simple reason that he was twice refused membership in the Bildender Künstler Berlin, the Berlin Association of Visual Artists.

This review originally appeared in The Outsider, magazine of Intuit: The Center for Intuitive and Outsider Art.

Review: The Lean Startup: How Today’s Entrepreneurs Use Continuous Innovation to Create Radically Successful Businesses

Posted in Art on January 28th, 2012

The Lean Startup: How Today's Entrepreneurs Use Continuous Innovation to Create Radically Successful Businesses
The Lean Startup: How Today’s Entrepreneurs Use Continuous Innovation to Create Radically Successful Businesses by Eric Ries
My rating: 4 of 5 stars

If the test of a good business book is how many ideas inspire you to take notes, this one passes quite nicely. I especially like the arguments for replacing a prioritization culture with a test culture.

View all my reviews

Review: Rome: A Cultural, Visual, and Personal History

Posted in Art on January 28th, 2012

Rome: A Cultural, Visual, and Personal History
Rome: A Cultural, Visual, and Personal History by Robert Hughes
My rating: 3 of 5 stars

If you’re interested in the history of Rome, with a bias toward the artistic history, this book is entertaining and engaging, even if poorly edited. There are numerous instances of redundancy and inaccuracy. As you get into the modern period, Hughes’ critical biases come a bit much to the fore. But still, I mostly enjoyed it.

View all my reviews

Review: Julius Shulman: Chicago Mid-Century Modernism

Posted in Art on January 2nd, 2012

Julius Shulman: Chicago Mid-Century Modernism
Julius Shulman: Chicago Mid-Century Modernism by Gary Gand
My rating: 4 of 5 stars

I grew up in a suburb where the kinds of houses described in this book provided welcome variation from the dominant ranches, colonials and split levels. (Indeed, I grew up visiting one of the houses featured in the book.)

These buildings grasped at the actual promise of suburban living that, through lack of imagination, was thoroughly obscured where I typically commonly spent my childhood days. They were invariably set on heavily wooded lots. Their flat roofs and wide expanses of glass facing the trees meant they did indeed blended nicely with the landscape, as their designers intended. That mattered even at the time, since in my suburb woods were the primary respite from youthful ennui. That the houses’ interior flows and furnishings often reflected the same refinement of taste as their architecture was less apparent to me at the time, but it still must have affected how these homes felt to move around in. In any case, they were one of the ways that the 20th Century artistic avant-garde infiltrated my corner of cultural conformity, though that only became meaningful many years later.

It’s a tragedy of residential architecture that what we knew as the “contemporary” style fell out of fashion as the main upgrade path for subdivision living. When all is said and done I don’t think the ubiquitous faux chateaux and their turrets are any worse than the upper-middle-class homes of my youth. It’s just that the only apparent upgrade today is to a full-on McMansion. The modernists houses were truly an aesthetic alternative to commodity construction. McMansions are simply more of the same, just more aggressive in their ostentation.

The case for that older 20th Century vision of gracious living is always helped when the photography is provided by Julius Shulman. The luminosity in his photography is literal, and his ability to communicate the graciousness of modernist houses, starting in the 1930s, did a lot to sell them to a wider audience. Thanks to multiple books in recent years, he is getting full credit for bringing that vision to life.

Shulman was 95 when he worked on the photos in this book, which was a labor of love by Chicagoland devotees of the modernist residential style. It goes without saying that the book is lovely; you want to see more of the houses or even live in one yourself. The writing is a bit choppy, but still informative, and that’s good enough given the visual richness of the work.

View all my reviews



Copyright 2009 William Swislow